Requirement of natural justice in plagiarism inquiry: the impact on Malaysian universities

No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014-00-00
Authors
Gan, J. E.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Description
Abstract : This article examines the requirement of fair procedure in plagiarism inquiry conducted by Malaysian universities. As a general rule, educational institutions have wide discretion to determine the procedure of their disciplinary inquiry. Headmasters and inquiry committees are not expected to hold elaborate inquiry or adopt procedure akin to a criminal trial. However, it is argued that universities should apply more rigorous procedure in view of the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 and the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 that impose specific due process requirements in disciplinary inquiry. A finding of plagiarism could be set aside where it was reached in violation of the rules of natural justice. Recent development suggests that such finding could be set aside on the ground of procedural unfairness even though the student had clearly committed plagiarism. Procedural issue aside, a university could be deemed to have contributed to a student’s act of plagiarism where it failed to issue proper guidelines on what constitutes plagiarism. Consequently, Malaysian universities might be forced to review their policy on plagiarism – in terms of content and clarity and whether the same is communicated effectively to students.
Full text access : School of Hospitality, Tourism & Culinary Arts, Taylor’s University, Malaysia (e-mail: jooee.gan@taylors.edu.my)
Article published in : [2014] Law Review 102
Title
Requirement of natural justice in plagiarism inquiry: the impact on Malaysian universities
Author's Name
Author(s) Name
Author(s)(Original)
Gan, J. E.
Editor(s)(Original)
Recipient
Creator(s) Name
Date
Year Created
2014-00-00
Description
Abstract : This article examines the requirement of fair procedure in plagiarism inquiry conducted by Malaysian universities. As a general rule, educational institutions have wide discretion to determine the procedure of their disciplinary inquiry. Headmasters and inquiry committees are not expected to hold elaborate inquiry or adopt procedure akin to a criminal trial. However, it is argued that universities should apply more rigorous procedure in view of the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 and the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 that impose specific due process requirements in disciplinary inquiry. A finding of plagiarism could be set aside where it was reached in violation of the rules of natural justice. Recent development suggests that such finding could be set aside on the ground of procedural unfairness even though the student had clearly committed plagiarism. Procedural issue aside, a university could be deemed to have contributed to a student’s act of plagiarism where it failed to issue proper guidelines on what constitutes plagiarism. Consequently, Malaysian universities might be forced to review their policy on plagiarism – in terms of content and clarity and whether the same is communicated effectively to students.
Full text access : School of Hospitality, Tourism & Culinary Arts, Taylor’s University, Malaysia (e-mail: jooee.gan@taylors.edu.my)
Article published in : [2014] Law Review 102
Running Time
Recording Format
Citation
Subject
Plagiarism--Education--Law and legislation--Malaysia
Universities and colleges--Law and legislation--Malaysia
Education, Higher--Law and legislation--Malaysia
Subject (Others)
Dissertation Advisor
Chapter Number
Phone contacts
Content
Degree Name
Medium
Newspaper Name
Notes
Total Pages
Patent Number
Title of Proceedings
Academic Qualifications
Research Field/Interest
School
School of Hospitality, Tourism and Culinary Arts
Series
Summary
Year